[ewg] Infiniband Interoperability

Matt Breitbach matthewb at flash.shanje.com
Wed Jul 7 15:37:00 PDT 2010


We disconnected one port on the IB card that was a dual port card.  The
second port was not configured, so I can't imagine it caused problems, but
it is completely disconnected now.

 

As for a Subnet Manager on OpenSolaris - there isn't one.  I believe they do
have one for Solaris, but I do not believe that it's been released to
OpenSolaris, and I can't find it anywhere on our system.

 

  _____  

From: richard at informatix-sol.com [mailto:richard at informatix-sol.com] 
Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2010 12:54 AM
To: Matt Breitbach; ewg at lists.openfabrics.org
Subject: Re: [ewg] Infiniband Interoperability

 

When I had multiple SM's running none reported it as a problem.
Sun developed their own for Solaris. I can't recall now what they called it.

The other possibility i've seen cause problems with ipoib is having 2 ports
on the same IP subnet. Either bond them or disable ARP responses on one
port. This is due to the broadcast simulation across multicast.


Richard

----- Reply message -----
From: "Matt Breitbach" <matthewb at flash.shanje.com>
Date: Wed, Jun 30, 2010 19:32
Subject: [ewg] Infiniband Interoperability
To: <richard at informatix-sol.com>, <ewg at lists.openfabrics.org>

The Mellanox switch as far as I can tell does not have any SM running.  It
is a pretty dumb switch and there really isn't much to configure on it.



LID 6 is the LID that OpenSM is running on - which is our CentOS 5.5 blade.
I believe that it's reporting the issue since it's the Subnet Manager.



The only other possibility is that there is a subnet manager running on the
OpenSolaris box, but I have not been able to find one to blame this on.  I
would also think that in the OpenSM.log file I would find some reports of an
election of some sort if there were multiple SM's running.



LID listing : 



LID 1 - SuperMicro 4U running OpenSolaris (InfiniHost EX III PCI-E card w/
128MB RAM)

LID 2 - Blade Server currently running CentOS 5.5 and Xen (ConnectX
Mezzanine card)

LID 3 - InfiniScale III Switch

LID 4 - SuperMicro 4U running OpenSolaris (InfiniHost EX III PCI-E card w/
128MB RAM - 2nd port)

LID 5 - Blade Server running Windows 2008R2 (ConnectX Mezzanine card)

LID 6 - Blade Server running CentOS 5.5 and OpenSM (ConnectX Mezzanine card)

LID 7 - Blade Server running Windows 2008 (InfiniHost EX III Mezzanine card)



As for toggling the enable state - according to ibdiagnet the lowest
connected rate member is at 20Gbps, but the network is only operating at
10Gbps.  I'm not sure which system I would toggle the enable state for.



-Matt Breitbach

 _____  

From: richard at informatix-sol.com [mailto:richard at informatix-sol.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2010 1:14 PM
To: Matt Breitbach; ewg at lists.openfabrics.org
Subject: Re: [ewg] Infiniband Interoperability



I'm still suspicious that you have more than one SM running. Mellonex
switches have it enabled by default.
It's common that ARP requests, as caused by ping, will result in multicast
group activity. 
Infiniband creates these on demand and tears them down if there are no
current members. There is no broadcast address. It uses a dedicated MC
group.
They all seem to originate to LID 6 so you can trace the source.

If you have ports at non optimal speeds, try toggling their enable state.
This often fixes it.          

Richard

----- Reply message -----
From: "Matt Breitbach" <matthewb at flash.shanje.com>
Date: Wed, Jun 30, 2010 15:33
Subject: [ewg] Infiniband Interoperability
To: <ewg at lists.openfabrics.org>

Well, let me throw out a little about the environment : 



We are running one SuperMicro 4U system with a Mellanox InfiniHost III EX
card w/ 128MB RAM.  This box is the OpenSolaris box.  It's running the
OpenSolaris Infiniband stack, but no SM.  Both ports are cabled to the IB
Switch to ports 1 and 2.



The other systems are in a SuperMicro Bladecenter.  The switch in the
BladeCenter is an InfiniScale III switch with 10 internal ports and 10
external ports.



3 blades are connected with Mellanox ConnectX Mezzanine cards.  1 blade is
connected with an InfiniHost III EX Mezzanine card.



One of the blades is running CentOS and the 1.5.1 OFED release.  OpenSM is
running on that system, and is the only SM running on the network.  This
blade is using a ConnectX Mezzanine card.



One blade is running Windows 2008 with the latest OFED drivers installed.
It is using an InfiniHost III EX Mezzanine card.



One blade is running Windows 2008 R2 with the latest OFED drivers installed.
It is using an ConnectX Mezzanine card.



One blade has been switching between Windows 2008 R2 and CentOS with Xen.
Windows 2008 is running the latest OFED drivers, CentOS is running the 1.5.2
RC2.  That blade is using a ConnectX Mezzanine card.



All of the firmware has been updated on the Mezzanine cards, the PCI-E
InfiniHost III EX card, and the switch.  All of the Windows boxes are
configured to use Connected mode.  I have not changed any other settings on
the Linux boxes.



As of right now, the network seems stable.  I've been running pings for the
last 12 hours, and nothing has dropped.



I did notice in the OpenSM log though some odd entries that I do not believe
belong there.  



Jun 30 06:56:26 832438 [B5723B90] 0x02 -> log_notice: Reporting Generic
Notice type:3 num:67 (Mcast group deleted) from LID:6
GID:ff12:1405:ffff::3333:1:2

Jun 30 06:57:53 895990 [B5723B90] 0x02 -> log_notice: Reporting Generic
Notice type:3 num:66 (New mcast group created) from LID:6
GID:ff12:1405:ffff::3333:1:2

Jun 30 07:18:06 770861 [B6124B90] 0x02 -> log_notice: Reporting Generic
Notice type:3 num:67 (Mcast group deleted) from LID:6
GID:ff12:1405:ffff::3333:1:2

Jun 30 07:19:14 835273 [B5723B90] 0x02 -> log_notice: Reporting Generic
Notice type:3 num:66 (New mcast group created) from LID:6
GID:ff12:1405:ffff::3333:1:2





I would not think that new mcast groups should be created or deleted when
there are no new adapters being added to the network, especially in this
small of a network.  Is it odd to see those messages?



Also, I have a warning when I run ibdiagnet - "Suboptimal rate for group.
Lowest member rate: 20Gbps > group-rat

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openfabrics.org/pipermail/ewg/attachments/20100707/29bc8ecf/attachment.html>


More information about the ewg mailing list