<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META NAME="Generator" CONTENT="MS Exchange Server version 6.5.7651.59">
<TITLE>RE: [ewg] [PATCH 0/10 VNIC] VNIC patch series for OFED-1.3</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<!-- Converted from text/plain format -->
<P><FONT SIZE=2>Hal,<BR>
<BR>
-----Original Message-----<BR>
From: Hal Rosenstock [<A HREF="mailto:hal.rosenstock@gmail.com">mailto:hal.rosenstock@gmail.com</A>]<BR>
Sent: Thu 8/23/2007 7:14 PM<BR>
To: Kuchimanchi, Ramachandra<BR>
Cc: vlad@mellanox.co.il; ewg@lists.openfabrics.org<BR>
Subject: Re: [ewg] [PATCH 0/10 VNIC] VNIC patch series for OFED-1.3<BR>
<BR>
> Shouldn't a more flexible naming scheme like ulp/qlogic or ql_vnic be<BR>
> used for these ? VNIC is too generic a name.<BR>
<BR>
This is on my list of things to do and I hope to get it done soon.<BR>
<BR>
Regards,<BR>
Ram<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
</FONT>
</P>
</BODY>
</HTML>