[Fwd: Re: [openib-general] ib_verbs.h ib_device_attr device type]

[Roland Dreier]

    Hal> I think this has now come full circle as that was my original
    Hal> proposal for this (to add another field to
    Hal> ib_device_attr). Roland then responded to add it into the
    Hal> ib_device flags. I don't really have a strong preference for
    Hal> which way.

I don't have a strong preference either.  However I would put the
field in struct ib_device rather than ib_device_attr -- no point
forcing the consumer to allocate a ib_device_attr and call the query
function just to find out something that can't ever change.

 - R.