[openib-general] semantics of process_mad?

[Hal Rosenstock]

On Mon, 2004-09-13 at 15:55, Hal Rosenstock wrote:
> > Actually I was convinced that we don't want the QP number (it should
> > be up to the access layer to filter out class/QPN mismatches like SMPs
> > received on QP1).
> 
> I'm just about to code this into the receive path now :-) I'm assuming
> that the transmit side doesn't need this paranoid checking for miscoded
> clients.

Is DQPN (from the BTH) missing in order to do the class/QPN filtering ?
Should it be added to the end of the ib_mad struct ?

-- Hal