[openib-general] [PATCH] uDAPL dapl_os_wait_object_wait()

[Nishanth Aravamudan]

On 25.07.2005 [15:20:29 -0700], Arlin Davis wrote:
> James,
> 
> Here is a patch to fix dapl_os_wait_object_wait() returning 
> EINVAL when passing nsec == 1000000000 to pthread_cond_timedwait(). 
> Hit a rare case where _microsecs was exactly 1000000.

Hrm, rather than use all of these hard-coded numbers, might it not be
better to have USEC_PER_SEC, etc. as #defines? Just makes the code a
bit clearer without too much thought. Just my experience in dealing with
time/timer code :)

Thanks,
Nish