[openib-general] Re: uverbs comp events

[Sean Hefty]

Arlin Davis wrote:
> Yes, this is certainly another option; albeit one that requires more 
> system resources. Why not take full advantage of the FD resource we 
> already have? It's your call, but uDAPL and other multi-thread 
> applications could make good use of a wakeup feature with these event 
> interfaces. An event model that allows users to create events and get 
> events but requires them to use side band mechanisms to trigger the 
> event seems incomplete to me.

I'm leaning more towards Arlin's thinking on this, but whatever is 
decided, I think that uCM and uAT should match.

- Sean