[openib-general] RDMA connection and address translation API

[Tom Tucker]

Isn't this inevitable regardless of whether or not we have a tranport
independent connection API. I thought ATS was required by NFS for
authentication/authorization. Sorry in advance if I'm confused ---
again.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: openib-general-bounces at openib.org 
> [mailto:openib-general-bounces at openib.org] On Behalf Of Roland Dreier
> Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2005 3:27 PM
> To: James Lentini
> Cc: Caitlin Bestler; openib-general at openib.org
> Subject: Re: [openib-general] RDMA connection and address 
> translation API
> 
>     James> I agree with Caitlin. The eventual solution cannot force
>     James> protocol modifications in ULPs.
> 
> Does this mean we're stuck with the current use of ATS in NFS-RDMA?
> Surely there's still time to fix the protocol.
> 
>  - R.
> _______________________________________________
> openib-general mailing list
> openib-general at openib.org
> http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
> 
> To unsubscribe, please visit 
> http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
>