[openib-general] RE: Connection and Address Translation

James Lentini jlentini at netapp.com
Wed Aug 24 14:22:06 PDT 2005



On Wed, 24 Aug 2005, Caitlin Bestler wrote:

> As long as the "unspecified" local address remains a valid option 
> the proposed API split is defnitely implementable under iWARP. But 
> it is obviously simpler to just keep the same semantics as the 
> exported kDAPL interface. Is there a definite benefit to making the 
> change, if so what and for which middleware/application?

What is "the change" you are refering to?



More information about the general mailing list