[openib-general] Re: [PATCH] sdp: replace ip_dev_find with dev_base scan (was Re: ip_dev_find resolution?)

[Hal Rosenstock]

On Mon, 2005-12-12 at 15:55, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> Quoting Hal Rosenstock <halr at voltaire.com>:
> > > But now we only do the list walk if the ip route resolution returns
> > > a loopback device, so we are ok, right?
> > 
> > That's the way it seems to me (at least for SDP but not CMA (addr)).
> 
> OK, Sean, do you want to cook up a patch for CMA based on this code of mine?
> I could do it too but I dont have a way to test cma yet.

It's used in 2 ways in addr.c from what I can see. One is for the local
address, the other not. So I'm not sure the same thing can be done here.

-- Hal