[openib-general] dev_remove in the CMA

[Tom Tucker]

Sean:

I'm don't understand the dev_remove usage in the rdma_cm_id. It looks to
me like if the user calls rdma_resolve_addr, but never calls
rdma_resolve_route that the device could not be removed. Is this the
intended behavior? 

Is the goal to prevent the user from removing the device if the client
is in a callback? If so, can't we just increment and decrement in the
cma_notify_user function?  I guess I just don't understand...

Thanks,

Tom