[openib-general] RE: Separating SA and SM Keys

Eitan Zahavi eitan at mellanox.co.il
Tue Dec 20 00:17:35 PST 2005


Hi Hal,

I think we need to stick to the IB spec terminology.
Since the spec did not change and only added some note describing the
change we probably just need to add such comment too.

I can see people looking at the sa_key and trying to find it in the
spec...

Eitan

Eitan Zahavi
Design Technology Director
Mellanox Technologies LTD
Tel:+972-4-9097208
Fax:+972-4-9593245
P.O. Box 586 Yokneam 20692 ISRAEL


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hal Rosenstock [mailto:halr at voltaire.com]
> Sent: Monday, December 19, 2005 5:27 PM
> To: Eitan Zahavi; Yael Kalka
> Cc: openib-general at openib.org
> Subject: Separating SA and SM Keys
> 
> Hi,
> 
> In order to support separate SA and SM keys and make this clearer, I
> propose to change ib_types.h as follows.
> 
> -- Hal
> 
> Index: ib_types.h
> ===================================================================
> --- ib_types.h  (revision 4540)
> +++ ib_types.h  (working copy)
> @@ -3618,7 +3618,7 @@ typedef struct _ib_sa_mad
>         ib_net32_t                              seg_num;
>         ib_net32_t                              paylen_newwin;
> 
> -       ib_net64_t                              sm_key;
> +       ib_net64_t                              sa_key;
> 
>         ib_net16_t                              attr_offset;
>         ib_net16_t                              resv3;



More information about the general mailing list