[openib-general] Re: [PATCH applied] return -ENOPROTOOPT on an unsupported socket option

[Tom Duffy]

On Dec 19, 2005, at 3:05 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> Hmm. Which option do you have in mind, specifically?

LINGER comes to mind.  But something like SYNCNT, WINDOW_CLAMP, or  
QUICKACK doesn't make much sense on SDP, so why not just say we  
support it?

> The right thing, in my eyes, is to emulate a TCP socket.
> So we dont want to support options that TCP doesnt support.

TCP supports many more options.  Perhaps we should special case those.

-tduffy