[openib-general] [kernel verbs] u64 vs dma_addr_t

James Lentini jlentini at netapp.com
Fri Dec 30 12:54:17 PST 2005

Previous message (by thread): [openib-general] $BD>@\EEOC$G$*OC$7$^$;$s$+!)(B
Next message (by thread): [openib-general] [kernel verbs] u64 vs dma_addr_t
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Why does the kernel verbs API use u64 as the type for I/O virtual 
addresses instead of dma_addr_t (e.g. mthca_mr_alloc_phys()'s iova 
param)?

james

Previous message (by thread): [openib-general] $BD>@\EEOC$G$*OC$7$^$;$s$+!)(B
Next message (by thread): [openib-general] [kernel verbs] u64 vs dma_addr_t
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

More information about the general mailing list