[openib-general] RFC on SDP checkin

Tom Duffy tduffy at sun.com
Fri Feb 4 11:33:18 PST 2005


On Fri, 2005-02-04 at 11:21 -0800, Libor Michalek wrote:
>   3) Since the rest of the tree is not destabilized or effected in
>      any other way by the code, just check it into tree itself.
>      (e.g. gen2/trunk/src/linux-kernel/infiniband/ulp/sdp)
> 
>   Anyone have thoughts on this? Personally I'm leaning towards #3,
> but that's because it's the least amount of work for me. :)

I would like #3 as well.  Libor, would it be possible to get a preview
of what is going to be checked in?  Maybe with a small one-pager about
how to use it, etc?

Thanks,

-tduffy
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.openfabrics.org/pipermail/general/attachments/20050204/bdcb6907/attachment.sig>


More information about the general mailing list