[openib-general] Re: Re: SDP_CONN_LOCK

[Michael S. Tsirkin]

Quoting r. Libor Michalek <libor at topspin.com>:
>   And here I would have thought SDP_CONN_HOLD as a macro would have
> bugged people more. :)
> 
> -Libor
> 

Regarding conn_hold/conn_put (macro or not):
1. conn_put is sometimes called while socket is locked (sdp_cm_connect),
   sometimes not (sdp_ip2pr_path_complete). What gives?
   Is it OK to destroy the socket while its locked? Seems strange ...

2. When conn_put is called *outside* the lock, what prevents conn_hold
   from being called while conn_put is in progress, thus hold will be
   acting in parallel with destroy?


-- 
MST - Michael S. Tsirkin