[openib-general] Re: [PATCH][SDP][14/22] Whitespace cleanup in sdp_proto.h
tduffy at sun.com
Tue Feb 22 15:09:01 PST 2005
On Sun, 2005-02-20 at 02:05 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> That does not seem to be the case for __sdp_inet_write_space, or for
> other stuff in sdp_proto.h, so I think these functions shall have proper names
> starting with an alphanumeric.
If functions (or structs) are static, does it make sense to prefix them
with sdp_ either?
For that matter, what about the .c and .h files? Shouldn't the sdp_ be
removed on those as well?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
More information about the general