[openib-general] Re: [PATCH][SDP][14/22] Whitespace cleanup in sdp_proto.h

[Tom Duffy]

On Sun, 2005-02-20 at 02:05 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> That does not seem to be the case for __sdp_inet_write_space, or for
> other stuff in sdp_proto.h, so I think these functions shall have proper names
> starting with an alphanumeric.

If functions (or structs) are static, does it make sense to prefix them
with sdp_ either?

For that matter, what about the .c and .h files?  Shouldn't the sdp_ be
removed on those as well?

-tduffy
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.openfabrics.org/pipermail/general/attachments/20050222/39d5fd64/attachment.sig>