[openib-general] [PATCHv3][RFC] kDAPL: use cm timers instead of own

Tom Duffy tduffy at sun.com
Wed Jun 1 13:19:14 PDT 2005


On Wed, 2005-06-01 at 16:12 -0400, Talpey, Thomas wrote:
> At 03:48 PM 6/1/2005, Tom Duffy wrote:
> >I have tested this
> >version using kdapltest in quit, performance, and transaction modes.
> 
> Do any of these tests intentionally trigger timer events? I don't think
> they do...

Tom, do you know of a test that will?

> BTW :-) surely you can think of an even more colorful name than this!

Trying to be professional here ;-)

> >static inline u8 dapl_convert_ms_to_kookyib(unsigned long ms) 
> 
> Shouldn't this routine live in an IB-specific area, not core DAPL?

Well, maybe, if other ULPs want to use ms instead of IB.  Do you know if
this is the case?

-tduffy
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.openfabrics.org/pipermail/general/attachments/20050601/858e454a/attachment.sig>


More information about the general mailing list