[openib-general] RE: [dat-discussions] comments on DAT registry in OpenIB

[Tom Duffy]

On Wed, 2005-06-29 at 20:19 -0700, Caitlin Bestler wrote:
> Source compatability for an existing Provider is *not* maintained by
> OpenIB
> kDAPL because there are fields *missing* from the Provider Info. That
> *will*
> result in a compilation error.

I have no problem with there being a header file with allows for source
compatibility.  This header would be maintained by OpenIB, but never
included in upstream.  I think James has a start of such a header called
kdat.h.  It needs a bunch more to make it follow the DAT conventions.

-tduffy

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.openfabrics.org/pipermail/general/attachments/20050630/6c3a4238/attachment.sig>