[openib-general] kDAPL location?

[James Lentini]

Tom,

My original plan was to branch as you suggested, but I was warned that 
maintaining synchronization with the base code line would be 
difficult.

We don't anticipate needing to make substantial driver modifications 
for DAPL. I'd be surprised if more than a handful of files (< 10) 
changed. Currently only the Makefile and Kconfig need to be updated.

Given that, does Libor's suggestion to place the code in gen2/users 
make sense or would you still recommend a full branch?

james

On Tue, 29 Mar 2005, Libor Michalek wrote:

> On Tue, Mar 29, 2005 at 12:06:29PM -0800, Tom Duffy wrote:
>> On Tue, 2005-03-29 at 10:10 -0500, James Lentini wrote:
>>> Should I follow the above plan? Are there any other suggestions?
>>
>> I think you should either branch trunk or roland-uverbs and put all the
>> DAPL stuff in there so that it can easily be merged back to trunk when
>> it is ready.
>
>  Either branch as Tom suugests, or if you want to maintain the code
> against the head of tree I would suggest placing it somewhere besides
> the brach directory, such as the gen2/users directory.
> (e.g. gen2/users/jlentini)
>
> -Libor
>