[openib-general] [patch] misc trivia nitpicks 01

[Bernhard Fischer]

On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 05:32:57PM -0700, Libor Michalek wrote:
>On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 07:09:56PM +0200, Bernhard Fischer wrote:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> please consider attached.
>> 
>> diffstat ./gen2.2257.cow-20050505-1902.diff
>>  linux-kernel/infiniband/ulp/sdp/sdp_actv.c |   27 +--
>>  userspace/libmthca/src/mthca.c |    4
>>  userspace/management/osm/include/opensm/osm_subnet.h |   79 +++++-----
>>  userspace/management/osm/include/vendor/osm_vendor_mtl_transaction_mgr.h |   43 ++---
>>  userspace/management/osm/opensm/osm_sa_service_record.c |    8 -
>>  userspace/management/osm/opensm/osm_sm_state_mgr.c |   38 ++--
>>  userspace/management/osm/opensm/osm_sw_info_rcv.c |    9 -
>>  userspace/management/osm/opensm/osm_trap_rcv.c |   62 +++----
>>  8 files changed, 134 insertions(+), 136 deletions(-)
>
>Bernhard,
>
>  I have no problem with the content, but I think this would be easier if
>you submitted a patch per module/program, so each maintainer could treat
>this independently.

I tend to disagree. I'm an independant nitpicker. I'll try to separate
those, but if a patch -- especially a relatively trivial one, which
mostly touches obvious typos in the documentation -- comes in, i'd think
that you in the sense of payed maintainers should be able to weight if
you can apply them, regardless of who pays the 3 minutes to read through
it.

At any rate, i'll try to send them as separate patches per vendor in the
future..

PS:
cisco is core, mthca, sdp, and voltaire is osm, yes? Or would a split
per individual be better? I really don't know.
>
>-Libor
>
>