[openib-general] [PATCH] kDAPL: remove DAT_UINT32 and DAT_UINT64

[James Lentini]

I intentionally created a separate kdapltest directory in anticipation 
of needing to modify it to support changes in the DAT API for Linux. I 
do expect some divergence from the original test program.

While there isn't a need to make modifications to the coding style, I 
think the test could use a thorough review. In particular, I'd like 
to see a better separation between the client and server sides of the 
test. If anyone is interested in volunteering for that please let me 
know.

james

On Fri, 6 May 2005, Tom Duffy wrote:

> On Thu, 2005-05-05 at 23:17 -0700, Caitlin Bestler wrote:
>> Why does kDAPLtest have to be pre-integrated with the kernel?
>>
>> It was in a distinct directory for a reason.
>
> You are correct.  kdapltest does not need to be integrated and can be
> coded in whatever style you prefer.
>
> -tduffy
>