[openib-general] Re: [PATCH] fix umad object lifetime stuff
rolandd at cisco.com
Tue Nov 1 09:51:59 PST 2005
>> Roland Dreier wrote: > Something like this is probably required
>> for ucm and anything else > that exports a character device,
>> since everyone seems to have copied > my bad user_mad code.
>> But I haven't had a chance to do anything > beyond user_mad and
>> uverbs so far...
Hal> Should this be done for uat too or doesn't it matter ?
The bugs definitely exist in uat. However, fixing things like passing
kernel pointers to userspace would seem like a higher priority to me.
Or we could just deprecate uat in favor of Sean's work...
More information about the general