[openib-general] Re: uDAPL again

Aniruddha Bohra bohra at cs.rutgers.edu
Wed Nov 2 10:59:33 PST 2005


James Lentini wrote:

>On Wed, 2 Nov 2005, Aniruddha Bohra wrote:
>
>  
>
>>Hello,
>>   The following is the log for a request I am sending,
>>
>>The number of IOVs for req is 2. And the iov is shown below :
>>
>>REQ[0] = (0xb5f3f100, 48, 0xca88003b)^M
>>REQ[1] = (0xb5f3f2b8, 152, 0xca88003b)^M
>>
>>dapl_ep_post_send (0x8087110, 2, 0x808b300, 0xb5f3f6b4, 0)^M
>>dapl_ep_post_send : LOCALIOV[0] = (0xb5f3f100, 48, 0xca88003b)^M
>>dapl_ep_post_send : LOCALIOV[1] = (0xb5f3f2b8, 152, 0xca88003b)^M
>>post_snd: ep 0x8087110 op 2 ck 0x8087374 sgs 2 l_iov 0x808b300 r_iov
>>0xbf964290 f 0^M
>>post_snd: ep 0x8087110 cookie 0x8087374 segs 2 l_iov 0x808b300^M
>>post_snd_localiov: lkey 0xca88003b va 0xb5f3f100 len 48 ^M
>>post_snd: lkey 0xca88003b va 0xb5f3f100 len 48 ^M
>>post_snd_localiov: lkey 0xca88003b va 0xb5f3f2b8 len 152 ^M
>>post_snd: lkey 0xca88003b va 0xb5f3f2b8 len 152 ^M
>>post_snd: op 0x2 flags 0x2 sglist 0xbf9641b0, 2^M
>>post_snd: returned^M
>>dapl_ep_post_send () returns 0x0^M
>>dapl_evd_wait (0x8083ca0, -1, 1, 0xbf9642d0, 0xbf9642cc)^M
>>dapl_evd_wait: EVD 0x8083ca0, CQ 0x8083da0^M
>>cq_object_wait: CQ channel 0x8081290 time -1^M
>>cq_object_wait: RET evd 0x8083ca0 ibv_cq 0x8083da0 ibv_ctx (nil) Success^M
>>        >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<^M
>>        dapl_evd_dto_callback : CQE ^M
>>                work_req_id 134771572^M
>>                status 12^M
>>    
>>
>
>Status 12 is IBV_WC_RETRY_EXC_ERR.
>
>Are you sure you can communicate over IB? Do pings over IPoIB work, 
>etc.?
>
>  
>
bohra at hora-3 ~]$ ping -b 10.10.10.255
WARNING: pinging broadcast address
PING 10.10.10.255 (10.10.10.255) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 10.10.10.12: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=0.034 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.13: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=8.98 ms (DUP!)
64 bytes from 10.10.10.12: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.033 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.13: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.095 ms (DUP!)
64 bytes from 10.10.10.12: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.025 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.10.13: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.096 ms (DUP!)

--- 10.10.10.255 ping statistics ---
3 packets transmitted, 3 received, +3 duplicates, 0% packet loss, time 
2020ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.025/1.544/8.986/3.328 ms, pipe 2
[bohra at hora-3 ~]$ ifconfig ib0
ib0       Link encap:UNSPEC  HWaddr 
00-00-04-04-FE-80-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00
          inet addr:10.10.10.12  Bcast:10.255.255.255  Mask:255.255.255.0
          inet6 addr: fe80::202:c901:81e:7471/64 Scope:Link
          UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:2044  Metric:1
          RX packets:4 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
          TX packets:77 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
          collisions:0 txqueuelen:128
          RX bytes:308 (308.0 b)  TX bytes:4788 (4.6 KiB)

My target is the filer, which does not respond to pings (10.10.10.11).

Aniruddha




More information about the general mailing list