[openib-general] RE: [dat-discussions] socket based connectionmodel for IB proposal - round 3

[Sean Hefty]

Caitlin Bestler wrote:
> Because current software can set any of the 64 bits.
> There is no assurance that any bit within the current 64
> being set means that privileged software on the remote
> side is vouching for the standardized portion of the
> private data.

The current software did not require changes to the CM protocol, and does 
provide assurance that the private data was formatted by a kernel entity.

This is not, nor has ever been an issue with the current implementation, despite 
your endless attempts to make it seem that way.

- Sean