[dat-discussions] RE: [openib-general] Re: iWARP emulationprotocol

[Richard Frank]

MessageOracle currently depends on 64 bytes of private data for connect and accept. 

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Kanevsky, Arkady 
  To: Davis, Arlin R ; dat-discussions at yahoogroups.com ; Grant Grundler 
  Cc: swg at infinibandta.org ; openib-general at openib.org 
  Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2005 11:31 AM
  Subject: RE: [dat-discussions] RE: [openib-general] Re: iWARP emulationprotocol


  Arlin,
  just to clarify, Intel MPI will not have problems with useing less than 64 bytes
  of private data.
  If a solution will provide you with 48 bytes of private data will it be sufficient?
  Arkady


  Arkady Kanevsky                       email: arkady at netapp.com

  Network Appliance                     phone: 781-768-5395

  375 Totten Pond Rd.                  Fax: 781-895-1195

  Waltham, MA 02451-2010          central phone: 781-768-5300

   

    -----Original Message-----
    From: Davis, Arlin R [mailto:arlin.r.davis at intel.com] 
    Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2005 11:30 AM
    To: dat-discussions at yahoogroups.com; Grant Grundler
    Cc: swg at infinibandta.org; openib-general at openib.org
    Subject: RE: [dat-discussions] RE: [openib-general] Re: iWARP emulationprotocol


    Arkady,

     

    Intel MPI (real consumer of uDAPL) has no problem with this change.

     

    -arlin

     


----------------------------------------------------------------------------

    From: dat-discussions at yahoogroups.com [mailto:dat-discussions at yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Kanevsky, Arkady
    Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2005 6:40 AM
    To: Grant Grundler; Caitlin Bestler
    Cc: Roland Dreier; swg at infinibandta.org; dat-discussions at yahoogroups.com; openib-general at openib.org
    Subject: [dat-discussions] RE: [openib-general] Re: iWARP emulation protocol

     

    Grant,
    The developers of the application(s) in questions are aware of the
    discussion.
    I will leave it to them to respond.

    I bring the discussion point at the weekly DAT Collaborative meeting
    which we have every Wednesday.

    I appologize that the DAT Collaborative charter does not allow
    to submit contribution without joining DAT Collaborative.
    But this is no different from Linux not accepting any contrubutions
    without proper license.
    Byt be rest assure that as a Chair I bring the concerns
    and suggestions stated in email discussion at the DAT meetings.

    Arkady

    Arkady Kanevsky                       email: arkady at netapp.com
    Network Appliance                     phone: 781-768-5395
    375 Totten Pond Rd.                  Fax: 781-895-1195
    Waltham, MA 02451-2010          central phone: 781-768-5300



    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: Grant Grundler [mailto:iod00d at hp.com] 
    > Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2005 8:02 PM
    > To: Caitlin Bestler
    > Cc: Grant Grundler; Roland Dreier; Kanevsky, Arkady; 
    > swg at infinibandta.org; dat-discussions at yahoogroups.com; 
    > openib-general at openib.org
    > Subject: Re: [openib-general] Re: iWARP emulation protocol
    > 
    > 
    > On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 04:40:54PM -0700, Caitlin Bestler wrote:
    > > > Roland (and the rest of us) would like to see someone name a
    > > > real consumer of the proposed interface. ie who depends on 
    > > > this change?
    > > > Then the dependency for that use/user can be discussed and 
    > > > appropriate tradeoffs made. Make sense?
    > > 
    > > Unfortunately not every application that is under 
    > development, or even 
    > > deployed, can be discussed in a google-searchable public 
    > forum. That 
    > > especially applies to user-mode development.
    > 
    > Well, this is open source. While I don't want to preclude 
    > closed source developement, it's usually necessary to have an 
    > open source consumer that any open source developer can test with.
    > 
    > > So I could have actually tested such applications and still not be 
    > > free to cite them here.
    > 
    > Understood. I'm not asking *you* to cite one unless you
    > happen to own one of the consumers. 
    > 
    > > With any luck some of them
    > > are following the discussion and will jump in on their own. 
    > > Unfortunately, since they are developing to uDAPL they are 
    > unlikely to 
    > > be following this discussion.
    > 
    > It doesn't help that the DAT yahoo-groups.com mailing list is 
    > rejecting my replies.  It would be helpful if someone 
    > following this forum could share Roland's question with DAT 
    > mailing list if it didn't make it there already and possibly 
    > explain why naming a consumer is necessary.
    > 
    > hth,
    > grant
    > 





    SPONSORED LINKS Protocol  Communication and networking  Wireless communication and networking  


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS 

      a..  Visit your group "dat-discussions" on the web.
        
      b..  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
       dat-discussions-unsubscribe at yahoogroups.com
        
      c..  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. 


----------------------------------------------------------------------------

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openfabrics.org/pipermail/general/attachments/20051019/50f8840a/attachment.html>