[dat-discussions] RE: [openib-general] Re: iWARP emulationprotocol
Arkady.Kanevsky at netapp.com
Thu Oct 20 09:36:04 PDT 2005
The updated proposal will have IP addresses and TCP ports of src and dst
in private data.
How TCP ports are mapped to IB service IDs is a separate proposal.
Arkady Kanevsky email: arkady at netapp.com
Network Appliance phone: 781-768-5395
375 Totten Pond Rd. Fax: 781-895-1195
Waltham, MA 02451-2010 central phone: 781-768-5300
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sean Hefty [mailto:mshefty at ichips.intel.com]
> Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2005 11:51 AM
> To: Kanevsky, Arkady
> Cc: Richard Frank; Lentini, James; Roland Dreier;
> swg at infinibandta.org; openib-general at openib.org; Davis, Arlin R
> Subject: Re: [dat-discussions] RE: [openib-general] Re: iWARP
> Kanevsky, Arkady wrote:
> > I will update the proposal for IBTA based on this feedback and all
> > other feedback posted. I will still separate private data usage
> > proposal and port mapping one.
> Again, I think that these should be in the same proposal.
> The CM REQ carries
> the IB transport layer address. The goal here is to map
> another transport layer
> address to the IB one. The source port is included in the
> private data. By not
> including the destination port, there's an assumption that
> it's provided
> somewhere else in the CM REQ. We should either make this
> explicit, or put the
> destination port in the private data as well.
> - Sean
More information about the general