[openib-general] Re: ibv_get_async_event

[Sean Hefty]

Roland Dreier wrote:
> I take this to mean that it's fine if CQEs _are_ retrieved after a QP
> is destroyed.  Since a CQE does not have a pointer to the QP, but only
> a QP number and a consumer-defined work request ID, I think this is
> OK; there's no direct reference to a stale resource.

I was actually thinking about the destruction of the CQ, not the QP.  Thinking 
about it more, it seems unlikely, but couldn't a user destroy a QP followed by 
the CQ before ibv_get_cq_event() returns?

- Sean