[openib-general] libibat/libibcm build mess

[Hal Rosenstock]

On Fri, 2005-09-09 at 19:57, Roland Dreier wrote:
> We probably want a patch like the below for libibcm.  I don't like it,
> because it makes libibcm officially depend on libibat, but on the
> other hand it's just making the current situation explicit.
> 
> Only this doesn't actually work: if we build libibcm after installing
> libibat, the check for <infiniband/at.h> fails because at.h includes
> sa.h, and libibat doesn't install sa.h.

So should we make libibat install sa.h ? Does that solve this ?

-- Hal