[openib-general] Re: udapl copyrights and OpenIB
halr at voltaire.com
Tue Sep 13 07:13:18 PDT 2005
On Tue, 2005-09-13 at 10:01, James Lentini wrote:
> My understanding is as follows: A copyright and a license are
> different. A copyright gives the creator the right to license the
> > > Like other OpenIB code, the uDAPL code can be taken under either a BSD
> > > license or GPLv2. uDAPL also allows the code to be licensed under the
> > > Common Public License 1.0.
> > What license is actually on the uDAPL files themselves ?
> The license text gives a user the option of any of the three licenses:
> * Copyright (c) 2002-2003, Network Appliance, Inc. All rights
> * reserved.
> * This Software is licensed under one of the following licenses:
> * 1) under the terms of the "Common Public License 1.0" a copy of
> * which is available from the Open Source Initiative, see
> * http://www.opensource.org/licenses/cpl.php.
> * 2) under the terms of the "The BSD License" a copy of which is
> * available from the Open Source Initiative, see
> * http://www.opensource.org/licenses/bsd-license.php.
> * 3) under the terms of the "GNU General Public License (GPL) Version
> * 2" a copy of which is available from the Open Source Initiative,
> * see http://www.opensource.org/licenses/gpl-license.php.
> * Licensee has the right to choose one of the above licenses.
> * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
> * notice and one of the license notices.
> * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce both the above
> * copyright notice, one of the license notices in the documentation
> * and/or other materials provided with the distribution.
That's fine. I didn't look closely enough. I didn't see the choices. I
thought it was the old license. Sorry.
More information about the general