[openib-general][PATCH][RFC]: CMA header

[Roland Dreier]

    >> There's no point in making this asynchronous, since we're
    >> putting the source/dest information in the CM REQ private data.

    Guy> Do we have to wait to an ibta approval to do this or can this
    Guy> be implemented right away, in this fashion ?

Certainly we should coordinate with the IBTA spec, but my feeling is
that we reached consensus on using CM private data instead of ATS.

    Guy> iSER, today, uses sid of 64bit, other ULP's might use 64bit
    Guy> sid's too, why limit them to 16 bit ?

How do you implement 64 bit SIDs over iWARP?  The whole point of this
API is to use IP addressing, which means IP address + port number.

 - R.