[openib-general][RFC]: CMA IB implementation

[Hal Rosenstock]

On Mon, 2005-09-26 at 12:55, Sean Hefty wrote:
> Guy German wrote:
> > I believe that ib_at is still a valuable module even if ATS reverse ARP 
> > is broken, and I think we should discuss this.
> 
> Here's my thinking on this.  ATS is broken as you mentioned for reverse lookups. 
>   However, if we want to keep ATS, I think that ATS registration/deregistration 
> should be integrated with IPoIB.

There was a desire expressed a long time ago to keep these separate.

>   To keep it separate, we will need to patch 
> net_device to provide an rdma_ptr as suggested by Roland.

This is also needed by SDP currently.

-- Hal