[openib-general][RFC]: CMA IB implementation

James Lentini jlentini at netapp.com
Thu Sep 29 08:27:05 PDT 2005



On Thu, 29 Sep 2005, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:

> BTW, one idea of mine that some people apparently were interested in,
> is adding an option to do ARP resolution on the passive side after REQ is
> received, as a weak security measure.
> 
> Is there still interest in that?

Given that the ARP response can be faked, I don't see a benefit to 
adding such a check.



More information about the general mailing list