[openib-general] Re: RE: Re: [PATCH] ipoib_flush_paths

[Michael S. Tsirkin]

Quoting r. Sean Hefty <sean.hefty at intel.com>:
> Note that ib_cm and rdma_cm technically have the same issue, since cm_id's can
> be destroyed by returning non-zero from a callback.  I.e. a user of those
> interfaces isn't forced to call anything when unloading.

OK, this means we must add struct module * pointer to ib_create_cm_id
and rdma_create_cm_id as well.

Could one of you guys build and commit such a patch for these modules?
I'm not in the lab.


-- 
MST