[openib-general] [RFC] AT and user AT

[James Lentini]

On Wed, 26 Apr 2006, Hal Rosenstock wrote:

> As AT and user AT have been obsoleted (and superceeded by CMA which 
> is now in the process of going upstream), any objections to removing 
> AT and user AT from the trunk ? If I don't hear back by COB Friday, 
> I will presume this is OK.

I'm in agreement with moving this off of the trunk. 

Will the code still be available for reference?