[openib-general] osm: More simulation faiures on trunk

[Eitan Zahavi]

Hi Hal,

Hal Rosenstock wrote:
> Hi Eitan,
>
> On Wed, 2006-12-06 at 13:02, Eitan Zahavi wrote:
>   
>> Hi Hal,
>>
>> Looks like the osm.fdbs file is now created with "UNREACHABLE" mark when 
>> opensm
>> is invoked with updn routing engine.
>>     
>
> Are you referring to certain LIDs being UNREACHABLE like this:
> LID    : Port : Hops : Optimal
> 0x0001 : UNREACHABLE
> 0x0002 : UNREACHABLE
> 0x0003 : 000  : 00   : yes
> 0x0004 : 001  : 02   : yes
> 0x0005 : 003  : 02   : yes
> 0x0006 : 001  : 01   : yes
> 0x0007 : UNREACHABLE
> 0x0008 : UNREACHABLE
> 0x0009 : UNREACHABLE
> 0x000A : 001  : 02   : yes
> 0x000B : 003  : 02   : yes
>
> So should UNREACHABLE LIDs just not be put into the file ? Or is it
> something else ?
>
>   
The UNREACHABLE is fine.
The problem is that ALL LFTs are full of UNREACHABLE. Actually there are 
no reachable nodes ...
>> I will be working on finding what changed between OFED 1.1 and the trunk.
>>     
>
> It was likely introduced by the changes to the routing engines committed
> yesterday and sent on the last in late Novemeber. git-bisect can help
> isolate exactly which change.
>   
Thanks I will follow that trail
>   
>> This is another cause for the failure of all osmMulticastRoutingTest and 
>> osmStability tests runs.
>>     
>
>   
>> Another one would be the change of the osm.mcfdbs which is parsed by 
>> IBDM too.
>>     
>
> Are you asking about the other patch again ?
>   
Do you have an estimate for when my patch will be merged ?

> -- Hal
>
>   
>> Eitan
>>
>>     
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> openib-general mailing list
> openib-general at openib.org
> http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
>
> To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
>