[openib-general] OpenSM Issues of the last couple days

[Hal Rosenstock]

On Sat, 2006-12-09 at 09:35, Eitan Zahavi wrote:
> Hal Rosenstock wrote:
> > On Fri, 2006-12-08 at 11:42, Eitan Zahavi wrote: 
> >   
> >> Hal Rosenstock wrote:
> >>     
> >>> Hi Eitan,
> >>>
> >>> Just wanted to close the loop on the OpenSM issues of the last couple
> >>> days.
> >>>
> >>> 1. When can you supply an OpenSM verbose log for the InformInfo
> >>> subscribe problem you reported earlier today ? Failing that, I don't
> >>> know how to reproduce this.
> >>>   
> >>>       
> >> Attached
> >>     
> I will need to look into it in greater details. Might be a simulator flow issue. But I am not sure.

Any idea on when you will have a chance to look into this ?

> >>> 4. I encourage you to look at and comment on the OpenSM patches rather
> >>> than waiting for them to be in the tree.
> >>>   
> >>>       
> >> I am sure you did not mean to, but now I have to admit my limited skills 
> >> in catching bugs by reading patches :-( .
> >>     
> >
> > Not just read, but they are there to try out as well.
> >   
> I will need an automatic flow for that sake. I can not keep up with the 
> amount of patches manually.
> But I do not know how to automatically convert the mails into patches 
> into a tree.
> > You could try out the patches and do the same thing before they are
> > committed.
> >
> >   
> I have automation based on the committed tree that pull it (git trem) , 
> compile and run regression.
> Actually this is how all other code is handled too.

Are you referring to OFED ?

In the case of OFED, where do those "special" trees/branches come from ?

-- Hal