[openib-general] [PATCH] osm: fat-tree documentation

Hal Rosenstock halr at voltaire.com
Sat Dec 30 13:21:17 PST 2006


On Sat, 2006-12-30 at 16:03, Eitan Zahavi wrote:
> Hal Rosenstock wrote:
> > On Wed, 2006-12-27 at 12:32, Hal Rosenstock wrote:
> >   
> >> On Wed, 2006-12-27 at 11:19, Yevgeny Kliteynik wrote:
> >>     
> >>> Hi Hal.
> >>>
> >>> Added fat-tree routing details and some cosmetics in the txt files.
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Yevgeny
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Yevgeny Kliteynik <kliteyn at dev.mellanox.co.il>
> >>>       
> >> Thanks. Applied.
> >>
> >> A couple of minor questions:
> >>
> >> Should similar text as in current-routing.txt be added to the OpenSM man
> >> page ?
> >>     
> >
> > I took care of making the man page including the fat tree routing
> > information you put into current-routing.txt.
> >
> > The question below is outstanding:
> >
> >   
> >> Also, rather than HCA in the below, is CA better (to include TCAs as
> >> well) ?
> >>     
> >
> >   
> I agree CA is better then HCA.
> Hal, can you take it or want a patch?

I'll change this.

-- Hal

> > Thanks.
> >
> > -- Hal
> >
> >   
> >> -- Hal
> >>     
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > openib-general mailing list
> > openib-general at openib.org
> > http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
> >
> > To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
> >   
> 





More information about the general mailing list