[openib-general] nightly osm_sim report 2006-12-30:normal completion

Eitan Zahavi eitan at mellanox.co.il
Sat Dec 30 13:33:57 PST 2006


Hal Rosenstock wrote:
> Hi Eitan,
>
> On Sat, 2006-12-30 at 00:25, Eitan Zahavi wrote:
>   
>> OSM Simulation Regression Summary
>> OpenSM rev = Fri_Dec_29_12:19:08_2006 2e0f81 
>> ibutils rev = Wed_Dec_27_23:39:30_2006 60aebe 
>> Total=405 Pass=330 Fail=75
>>
>> Pass:
>> 45 Stability IS1-16.topo
>> 45 Pkey IS1-16.topo
>> 45 OsmStress IS1-16.topo
>> 45 Multicast IS1-16.topo
>> 45 LidMgr IS1-16.topo
>> 15 Stability IS3-loop.topo
>> 15 Stability IS3-128.topo
>> 15 Pkey IS3-128.topo
>> 15 OsmStress IS3-128.topo
>> 15 Multicast IS3-loop.topo
>> 15 Multicast IS3-128.topo
>> 15 LidMgr IS3-128.topo
>>
>> Failures:
>> 45 OsmTest IS1-16.topo
>> 15 OsmTest IS3-loop.topo
>> 15 OsmTest IS3-128.topo
>>     
>
> Any idea on these osmtest failures ? I did add SA MFTRecord yesterday
> and made a change to SA LFTRecord and SwitchInfoRecord the day before as
> well as additional osmtests for MFTRecord and LFTRecord.
>   
Actually I get a core dump:
#0  0x0805c265 in osm_mcast_tbl_get_block (p_tbl=0x8f6ef6c, 
block_num=-32575, position=0 '\0', p_block=0xb19e4d2c)
    at osm_mcast_tbl.c:299
299         p_block[i] = (*p_tbl->p_mask_tbl)[mlid_start_ho + i][position];

(gdb) p i
$1 = 2
(gdb) p mlid_start_ho
$2 = 6176
(gdb) p position
$3 = 0 '\0'
(gdb) where
#0  0x0805c265 in osm_mcast_tbl_get_block (p_tbl=0x8f6ef6c, 
block_num=-32575, position=0 '\0', p_block=0xb19e4d2c)
    at osm_mcast_tbl.c:299
#1  0x08073d29 in osm_switch_get_mft_block (p_sw=0x8f6eed8, 
block_num=32961, position=0 '\0', p_block=0xb19e4d2c)
    at ./../include/opensm/osm_switch.h:1074
#2  0x08073b8c in __osm_mftr_rcv_new_mftr (p_rcv=0x80e9a6c, 
p_sw=0x8f6eed8, p_list=0xb61c0370, lid=512, block=32961,
    position=0 '\0') at osm_sa_mft_record.c:181
#3  0x08074273 in __osm_mftr_rcv_by_comp_mask (p_map_item=0x8f6eed8, 
context=0xb61c0330) at osm_sa_mft_record.c:317
#4  0x00cd9747 in cl_qmap_apply_func (p_map=0x80e8584, 
pfn_func=0x8073f98 <__osm_mftr_rcv_by_comp_mask>, context=0xb61c0330)
    at cl_map.c:287
#5  0x08074653 in osm_mftr_rcv_process (p_rcv=0x80e9a6c, 
p_madw=0x8f29f0c) at osm_sa_mft_record.c:390
#6  0x08074ef2 in __osm_mftr_rcv_ctrl_disp_callback (context=0x80e9afc, 
p_data=0x8f29f0c) at osm_sa_mft_record_ctrl.c:63
#7  0x00cd3d4f in __cl_disp_worker (context=0x80e9d18) at 
cl_dispatcher.c:102
#8  0x00ce1297 in __cl_thread_pool_routine (context=0x80e9d5c) at 
cl_threadpool.c:74
#9  0x00ce0f61 in __cl_thread_wrapper (arg=0x8f1c690) at cl_thread.c:58
#10 0x00361371 in start_thread () from /lib/tls/libpthread.so.0
#11 0x001eaffe in clone () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6


> Also, why are osmtest failures allowed for "normal completion" ?
>
> -- Hal
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> openib-general mailing list
> openib-general at openib.org
> http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
>
> To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
>   





More information about the general mailing list