[openib-general] [PATCH] osm: fix num of blocks of GUIDInfo GetTable query

Hal Rosenstock halr at voltaire.com
Sun Jun 11 03:12:08 PDT 2006


Hi Eitan,

On Sun, 2006-06-11 at 02:07, Eitan Zahavi wrote:
> Hi Hal,
> 
> As the 1.0 does not support GUIDInfo I do not this patch is relevant to
> 1.0

Huh ? What's
https://openfabrics.org/svn/gen2/branches/1.0/src/userspace/management/osm/opensm/osm_sa_guidinfo_record.c

-- Hal

> 
> Eitan Zahavi
> Senior Engineering Director, Software Architect
> Mellanox Technologies LTD
> Tel:+972-4-9097208
> Fax:+972-4-9593245
> P.O. Box 586 Yokneam 20692 ISRAEL
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Hal Rosenstock [mailto:halr at voltaire.com]
> > Sent: Sunday, June 11, 2006 12:22 AM
> > To: Eitan Zahavi
> > Cc: OPENIB
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH] osm: fix num of blocks of GUIDInfo GetTable query
> > 
> > Eitan,
> > 
> > On Thu, 2006-06-08 at 07:24, Eitan Zahavi wrote:
> > > Hi Hal
> > >
> > > I'm working on passing osmtest check. Found a bug in the new
> > > GUIDInfoRecord query: If you had a physical port with zero guid_cap
> > > the code would loop on blocks 0..255 instead of trying the next
> port.
> > >
> > > I am still looking for why we might have a guid_cap == 0 on some
> > > ports.
> > >
> > > This patch resolves this new problem. osmtest passes on some
> arbitrary
> > > networks.
> > >
> > > Eitan
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by:  Eitan Zahavi <eitan at mellanox.co.il>
> > 
> > Thanks. Applied to trunk only.
> > 
> > Let me know if it also should be applied to 1.0.
> > 
> > -- Hal





More information about the general mailing list