[openib-general] Re: [PATCH] RFC Verbs: add support for transport specific verbs
rdreier at cisco.com
Wed Mar 1 09:22:23 PST 2006
Michael> I agree. Roland, what you might have missed is that the
Michael> first solution posted added a requirement to check device
Michael> type *in addition to checking the method is non-NULL and
Michael> its return code* on each transport-specific call, so it
Michael> had run-time penalty.
I don't think I really agree with you that the device type checks are
necessary in most places. For example, if we reach code that wants to
call the process_mad method, then we must already know that we're
dealing with an IB device.
More information about the general