[openib-general] Re: [PATCH 3/3] iWARP CM

Sean Hefty sean.hefty at intel.com
Thu Mar 16 13:16:01 PST 2006


>The bottom line requirement is that state transitions are
>atomic. As long as you know that at most one entity transitions
>the QP out of the Established state everything should work.

I'll buy this.  My comments and questions are just trying to make sure that I
understand everything that's happening, especially in areas where there's the
potential for a bug, more than there's a real issue.  For example, is there any
potential that the state could be driven two directions, with the resulting
state unknown?

- Sean




More information about the general mailing list