On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 05:04:58PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > why _irq and not _irqsave? Are you sure this code can't ever be called > > with interrupts off via some other path? > > Given the mutex_lock above, this better be true. Good point, but _irq instinctively makes me worried. Cheers, Muli