[openib-general] Re: CMA: compliancy issue?

[Sean Hefty]

Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> I actually think all we have to do is to change CMA behaviour on REP:
> send RTU after, and not before, calling user handler.
> Since other ULPs don't seem t care when RTU is sent, they will continue
> working.

I think that it makes more sense to give the user the CONNECT_RESPONSE event, 
and have them call rdma_accept() or rdma_reject(), versus allowing them to call 
rdma_reject() after an ESTABLISHED event.  There is already code for this; it's 
just tied to the existence of a QP off the rdma_cm_id.

- Sean