[openib-general] Re: Re: [PATCH] RE: compliancy issue?

[Michael S. Tsirkin]

Quoting r. Sean Hefty <mshefty at ichips.intel.com>:
> Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH] RE: compliancy issue?
> 
> >OK, I just tested and this works for me. Here's the SDP patch to do what 
> >you
> >described. The code actually got cleaner now: its convenient to get
> >different events on active versus passive side - previously I had
> >to check a flag to figure out what does ESTABLISHED mean.
> 
> I committed the CMA patch.
> 

Ditto for the SDP update.

-- 
MST