[openib-general] opensm segfault?

[Hal Rosenstock]

On Tue, 2006-05-16 at 16:10, Roland Dreier wrote:
>     Troy> And why the heck is "cl_memcpy" just a call to 'memcpy'
>     Troy> anyway?  This just seems like excessive uneeded abstraction.
> 
>     Hal> It's part of the component library, which is an OS
>     Hal> abstraction layer.
> 
> memcpy() is specified by the ISO C standard, so it seems pretty silly
> to abstract this.  Is there any platform that opensm could conceivably
> run on that doesn't supply memcpy()?

OK. I'll work up a patch to eliminate this if there are no objections.

-- Hal