[openib-general] Re: [PATCH] OpenSM: Use memory routines directly and eliminate cl_mem* routines

[Michael S. Tsirkin]

Quoting r. Hal Rosenstock <halr at voltaire.com>:
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] OpenSM: Use memory routines directly and eliminate cl_mem* routines
> 
> On Wed, 2006-05-17 at 18:07, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > Quoting r. Hal Rosenstock <halr at voltaire.com>:
> > > Right now, there is memory
> > > tracking code implemented.
> > 
> > Doesn't MALLOC_CHECK_ do what you want?
> 
> Yes, this looks good to me. Just a few questions:
> 
> Is this in all glibc's that we would care about ?

I think it's been there since the dawn of time :)

> I'm also not sure about the Windows implications here. Maybe Eitan can
> comment.

MSDN says:

"When the application is linked with a debug version of the C run-time
libraries, malloc resolves to _malloc_dbg. For more information about how the
heap is managed during the debugging process, see Using C Run-Time Library
Debugging Support."


-- 
MST