[openib-general] Re: CMA backlog

[Michael S. Tsirkin]

Quoting r. Sean Hefty <sean.hefty at intel.com>:
> Subject: RE: CMA backlog
> 
> >This approach would affect all ULPs, however. For example, no SDP imlementation
> >that I know of retries after a REJ - so this approach won't be interoperable.
> >And AFAIK SDP spec already interprets reject as connection refused.
> >There's no provision I cansee in SDP spec for retries on specific
> >reject code.
> 
> How did SDP expect to handle backlog then?  Or was that a consideration?

Right. That's the only way I can see to correctly handle backlog in SDP.

-- 
MST