[openib-general] [PATCH] [RFC] cma_new_id can kfree on error instead of destroy_id
mshefty at ichips.intel.com
Tue Oct 17 10:20:17 PDT 2006
Krishna Kumar wrote:
> cma_new_id() does not require to do destroy_id(), instead
> it can kfree(), since nothing is allocated on that id.
> Posting this as an RFC in case anyone feels that create_id
> should be cleaned up by destroy_id (even if redundant).
I can go either way on this. It's a little cleaner to match rdma_create_id()
with rdma_destroy_id(), rather than matching it with kfree(). It makes
More information about the general