[openib-general] [PATCH] IB/ipoib: NAPI

[Roland Dreier]

 > I just find a flag + conditional peek a much simpler approach.
 > Since all our testing is done on mthca anyway, almost
 > all approaches amount to doing a NOP in various ways for us.

Umm, that's a pretty parochial attitude...

 > So I would suggest
 > - get Eli's patch with simple flag into shape & working on all hardware,
 >   push into git.
 > - people interested in specific hardware test performance and propose patches
 >   to improve it even further.

What is a 'simple flag'?  Who is going to implement peek_cq() for ehca
and ipath?

I'm not really that interested in the most micro-optimized approach.
I'd rather have something simple and easy to maintain -- in other
words, I don't want 2 or 3 completion handling paths in IPoIB.  And
from that perspective, extending req_notify_cq() looks pretty good to
me.

 - R.