[ofa-general] Re: on the coexistance of uDAPLs

[Arlin Davis]

Karl Feind wrote:

>>comments? other suggestions?
>>
>>-arlin
>>    
>>
>
>I'd really like to see a separate RPM (called something like dapl-infra)
>that installs:
>
>	1) /etc/dat.conf  (empty)
>	2) a script that addes a provider to /etc/data.conf
>	3) a script that removes a provider from /etc/data.conf
>	4) libdat.so
>
>Any DAPL layer depends on this RPM, and invokes the scripts (2)
>and (3) in the preinstall and postuninstall setep.
>
>This decouples the DAPL infrastructure from the DAPL instantiations.
>
>Just an idea.
>  
>

Do you see the need for different versions to co-exist (1.1, 1.2, 2.0)?